Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim Mercer
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Date
Msg-id 20000120174044.D4188@reptiles.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:18:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The standard doesn't provide for specifically unsigned types, so I do not
> > believe anyone would want to go through that trouble. Sorry.
>
> Actually, oid data type is an unsigned int4.  If it does not behave that
> way, it is a bug.

is this just in pgsql, or in SQL in general?

--
[ Jim Mercer                 jim@reptiles.org              +1 416 506-0654 ]
[          Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood          ]
[  Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code.  ]

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unsigned Datatypes
Next
From: Sarah Officer
Date:
Subject: < and > for datetime