Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anastasia Lubennikova
Subject Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL
Date
Msg-id 1fb0fb8d-0857-382a-6198-392df6472125@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL  (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL  (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06.04.2020 16:49, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> New version of the patch is attached. I fixed several issues in the 
> check_for_changed_signatures().
>
> Now it passes check without "test_rename_catalog_objects" and fails 
> (generates script) with it. Test script pg_upgrade_ACL_test.sh 
> demonstrates this.
>
> The only known issue left is the usage of pg_identify_object(), though 
> I don't see a problem here with object types that this patch involves.
> As I updated the code, I will leave this patch in Need Review.
>
One more fix for free_acl_infos().
Thanks to cfbot.

-- 
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots