Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id 1f14df7b-5b62-cea3-af1b-39607801a2d4@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical Replication WIP  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Steve Singer <steve@ssinger.info>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

attached is version 13 of the patch.

I merged in changes from PeterE. And did following changes:
- fixed the ownership error messages for both provider and subscriber
- added ability to send invalidation message to invalidate whole
relcache and use it in publication code
- added the post creation/alter/drop hooks
- removed parts of docs that refer to initial sync (which does not exist
yet)
- added timeout handling/retry, etc to apply/launcher based on the GUCs
that exist for wal receiver (they could use renaming though)
- improved feedback behavior
- apply worker now uses owner of the subscription as connection user
- more tests
- check for max_replication_slots in launcher
- clarify the update 'K' sub-message description in protocol

-- 
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackups and slots
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6