On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, the lack of any formal testing of the extended-Query protocol
> is a real problem. I'm not sure of a good fix, but it bears some
> thinking about. Not only do we not have an automated way to notice
> if we broke functionality, but we don't really notice for either
> extended or basic protocol if we hurt performance.
I just posted something to -hackers about the availability of boxes
for QA purposes. It doesn't solve the problem by itself though.
A good answer is probably to plan optional JDBC benchmarks in the
benchfarm design - not all people want to run Java on their boxes but
we have servers of our own to do so. Andrew?
--
Guillaume
