Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound
Date
Msg-id 1c659890-cbf7-8c6d-266c-7521ab674bbf@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound  (Perumal Raj <perucinci@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound
List pgsql-general
On 3/11/19 11:51 AM, Perumal Raj wrote:
> Hi Experts
> 
> I have noticed in my Database that, there is no regular Vacuum 
> maintenance happening

What Postgres version?

> So i started Weekly Job across cluster. But still i am seeing gradual 
> growth on transacation ID.

What query are you using?

> 
> DB is still using default autovacuum_freeze_min_age & 
> autovacuum_freeze_table_age.

What are the actual settings for?:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/runtime-config-autovacuum.html

> 
> Question : Since i am running regularly vacuum job ( weekly) and the 
> Transaction age is gradually growing , What is next once i hit 200M 
> limit ( default ).
> Should i increase my default value ? If so any calculation for increase 
> the value based on my DB transaction growth.
> 
> Thanks,
> Raj


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Perumal Raj
Date:
Subject: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound
Next
From: Perumal Raj
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound