Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Radosław Smogura
Subject Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements
Date
Msg-id 1b5d82d343b5329d977b587decbe80eb@smogura-softworks.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Thank you, but I think about this last night. Opening unnecessary portals
isn't good idea, similarly sending 2nd describe when statement was
prepared. Currently JDBC drivers doesn't make this. I think better will be
to store what format we had requested on stack, and then coerce those
formats when results are handled.

Kind regards,
Radosław Smogura

On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 01:02:25 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com> writes:
>>> 21:43:02.264 (26)  FE=> Describe(statement=S_1)
>> You're still doing the statement-flavor Describe. As Tom pointed out,
>> this won't tell you the result types because it doesn't know them.
>> Actually, technically if you issue a statement-flavor Describe *after*
>> a Bind, the server does have this information, but I'm not surprised
>> that it doesn't send it correctly, since it seems pointless to send
>> the statement variation after already doing a Bind.
>
> In principle you could open more than one Portal off a Statement
> at the same time, so it wouldn't necessarily be well-defined anyway.
>
>             regards, tom lane

--
----------
Radosław Smogura
http://www.softperience.eu

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements
Next
From: Radosław Smogura
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements