On Wed, Sep 15, 2021, at 9:19 AM, vignesh C wrote:
I have extracted the parser code and attached it here, so that it will
be easy to go through. We wanted to support the following syntax as in
[1]:
CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR
TABLE t1,t2,t3, ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA s1,s2,
SEQUENCE seq1,seq2, ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA s3,s4;
I don't like this syntax. It seems too much syntax for the same purpose in a
single command. If you look at GRANT command whose ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA syntax
was extracted, you can use ON TABLE or ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA; you cannot use
both. This proposal allows duplicate objects (of course, you can ignore it but
the current code prevent duplicates -- see publication_add_relation).
IMO you should mimic the GRANT grammar and have multiple commands for row
filtering, column filtering, and ALL FOO IN SCHEMA. The filtering patches only
use the FOR TABLE syntax. The later won't have filtering syntax. Having said
that the grammar should be:
CREATE PUBLICATION name
[ FOR TABLE [ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] [ (column_name [, ...] ) ] [ WHERE (expression) ] [, ...]
| FOR ALL TABLES
| FOR ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
| FOR ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...] ]
[ WITH ( publication_parameter [= value] [, ... ] ) ]
ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD TABLE [ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] [ (column_name [, ...] ) ] [ WHERE (expression) ]
ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
ALTER PUBLICATION name ADD ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
ALTER PUBLICATION name SET TABLE [ ONLY ] table_name [ * ] [ (column_name [, ...] ) ] [ WHERE (expression) ]
ALTER PUBLICATION name SET ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
ALTER PUBLICATION name SET ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
ALTER PUBLICATION name DROP TABLE [ ONLY ] table_name [ * ]
ALTER PUBLICATION name DROP ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
ALTER PUBLICATION name DROP ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA schema_name, [, ...]
Opinions?
