Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch
Date
Msg-id 1acfe1a40701022208x4a280223k127dd57467863bb8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Loose ends in PG XML patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> * Shouldn't the xml type support binary I/O?  Right now it is the only
> standard datatype that doesn't.  I have no idea whether there is an
> appropriate representation besides text, but if not we could define the
> binary representation to be the same as text.

There is an effort to develop a binary xml format:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-characterization/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Scan update
Next
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: contrib regression failures after recent money type changes