Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date
Msg-id 1a2f01ce-b3da-3066-0642-3e311587ece3@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster  ("Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql@mailpen.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 5/28/21 5:38 PM, Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:

>>
>> Did it run in less than 10 hours?
>>
> 
> The original VACUUM FULL ANALYZE ran in 10 hours.  The plain ANALYZE ran 
> in 88 seconds.


Can you repeat your EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) of the query from your 
first post and post them here:

https://explain.depesz.com/

Other information:
1) A diff of your configuration settings between 9.6 and 13.2.

2) Are you running on the same AWS instance type for the two versions of 
Postgres?

It is not necessary to repeat the table/view definitions as they are 
available in the first post.

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Overriding natural order of query results for a subset
Next
From: Laura Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Overriding natural order of query results for a subset