On 6/27/17 01:21, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Commit ea9df812d8502fff74e7bc37d61bdc7d66d77a7f got rid of
> FirstPredicateLockMgrLock, but it's still referred to in a comment in
> predicate.c where the locking protocol is documented. I think it's
> probably best to use the name of the macro that's usually used to
> access the lock array in the code. Please see attached.
Does this apply equally to PredicateLockHashPartitionLock() and
PredicateLockHashPartitionLockByIndex()? Should the comment mention or
imply both?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
