On March 4, 2017 1:16:56 AM PST, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>Maybe. But it looks to me like this patch is going to have
>considerably more than its share of user-visible warts, and I'm not
>very excited about that. I feel like what we ought to be doing is
>keeping the index OID the same and changing the relfilenode to point
>to a newly-created one, and I attribute our failure to make that
>design work thus far to insufficiently aggressive hacking.
We literally spent years and a lot of emails waiting for that to happen. Users now hack up solutions like this in
userspace,obviously a bad solution.
I agree that'd it be nicer not to have this, but not having the feature at all is a lot worse than this wart.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
