Re: Declarative partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning
Date
Msg-id 19a3733b-ab58-b993-c858-ec8fc578ddfd@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning
Re: Declarative partitioning
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/06/08 22:22, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Amit Langote wrote
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I made a mistake in the last version of the patch which caused a relcache
>> field to be pfree'd unexpectedly.  Attached updated patches.
>
> 0003-... patch does not apply cleanly. It has some conflicts in pg_dump.c.
> I have tried fixing the conflict in attached patch.

Thanks.  See attached rebased patches.

Regards,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <