Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo?
Date
Msg-id 199912180346.WAA06174@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo?  (admin <admin@wtbwts.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo?  (admin <admin@wtbwts.com>)
List pgsql-general
> My results were exactly the same for btree and hash, even when vacumming
> between each index creation. Here's my query:
> SELECT * FROM prod_base WHERE mid='2';
>
> Here's my result:
> Index Scan using prod_mid_idx on prod_base (cost=2.05 rows=2 width=120)
>
> My database is perhaps not big enough to run some relevant tests, so
> please let me know if there's another way I could get a better idea of the
> resources used for using each searching method.

You have to look at index creation speed and index access speed.

Not sure which one wins in each category.  Also, index modification
speed may be important.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

************


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: admin
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo?
Next
From: admin
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] hash taboo?