Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...
Date
Msg-id 199911230618.BAA18462@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...  (Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh@mecomb.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...  (Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh@mecomb.com>)
List pgsql-general
> If the priorities include stability and reliability, that's what you get.
> If the priorities are features at any cost, you get junk.
>
> Though Open Source projects are less susceptible to featuritis, they're far
> from immune. Trouble is many PHBs only compare stuff feature by brochure
> feature.

We only do 2-3 major releases a year for a reason.  If it is not
reliable, it is useless.  This is not a computer game.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...
Next
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for ...