>
> There's been some talk of reimplementing WHERE ... IN ... so that it
> does something intelligent without help, but there are a lot of
> higher-priority problems on the TODO list...
>
> regards, tom lane
This only affect statement, where the "inner" select accesses some
stuff of the "outer" select statement ? Actually a statement like:
select * from table where index in (select foreign-key from table2 where table2.name = 'Hallo')
would not have such problems ? Correct ?
Marten
