> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The thing I liked about the existing algorithm is that it did the
> > sorting without the page faulting/thrashing caused by many sort
> > algorithms.
>
> Yes, I think we want to stick with the basic architecture of an
> initial replacement-selection filter operating in limited memory,
> followed by merge passes. I'm just thinking about how to reduce
> the amount of disk space chewed up by intermediate merge results...
Wonder how our create index does it. Seems it is must be similar.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
