> I wish I could recommend kerberos (which we already claim to support), but
> the implementations I've seen seem buggy. NetBSD and Solaris both have it
> built in, but there are subroutine name conflicts between the kerberos
> libraries and some standard libraries on both platforms (different
> conflicts). I think it's an example of good US technology being destroyed
> by the ITAR restrictions. The overseas NetBSD developers, and a large
> fraction of the US ones, don't touch the kerberos stuff, so it suffers
> bitrot. Excuse the rant.
>
Totally agree kerberos is a great way to go, if we can.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
