[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hi, Bruce,
>
> I've only just picked up the thread on optimizations (I get the digest for
> the pgsql-sql list). I really feel that a lot of effort could be saved with
> some good benefits if a stored proc mechanism is put into place. Once that
> has been done, it can be used to store temporary plans (procedures) for
> ad-hoc queries which are released on the termination of the connection.
> However, I think that a lot of users will develop stored procs to replace a
> lot of their existing common SQL, in order to (partially) optimize their
> systems. Perhaps in the PREPARE statement we could add a facility to allow
> the user to specify the TTL of the cached proc for an ad-hoc query.
>
> When I talk about stored procs, I don't mean functions. We already have
> those. I mean procedures that are able to return a rowset. Just to make
> sure nobody gets the wrong idea.
Not sure why our functions can't return tuples.
> Also, has anything happened about the idea to get PG to cluster (somebody
> mentioned Beowulf)?
No one has mentioned this.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
