Re: [SQL] optimizer woes ? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [SQL] optimizer woes ?
Date
Msg-id 199906151714.NAA11734@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to optimizer woes ?  (Howie <caffeine@toodarkpark.org>)
Responses Re: [SQL] optimizer woes ?
List pgsql-sql
> ircbot=> explain select nick,hostname,dttime,logtype from logins where
> nick=lower('anick') ORDER BY dttime desc;
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
> 
> Sort  (cost=19913.31 size=0 width=0)
>   ->  Seq Scan on logins  (cost=19913.31 size=42498 width=44)
> ---[ CUT ]---
> 
> but when removing the lower(), it uses the index:
> 
> ---[ CUT ]---
> ircbot=> explain select nick,hostname,dttime,logtype from logins where
> nick='anick' ORDER BY dttime desc;
> 
> NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:
> 
> Sort  (cost=15.68 size=0 width=0)
>   ->  Index Scan using logins_nick_idx on logins  (cost=15.68 size=214
> width=44)
> ---[ CUT ]---
> 
> shouldn't the optimizer convert lower('anick') to lowercase first, then
> use that value in searching the logins_nick_idx index ?
> 
> btw, this is using postgres 6.4.2 (system is a debian box, p2-350 with
> 256m, all uw scsi </brag> )
> 

We have on our TODO list:
* Use index with constants on functions

Seems we have not implemented it yet.  It may be done in 6.5, but I
don't think so.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: stevew
Date:
Subject: Function security?
Next
From: "Jackson, DeJuan"
Date:
Subject: RE: [SQL] Function security?