Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug?
Date
Msg-id 199811232318.XAA20903@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I think this is a bug in 6.4: >>  >> bray=> select rcname, rcsrc from pg_relcheck where rcrelid
=>> '115404'::oid and rcrelid in (select min(rcrelid) from pg_relcheck >> group by rcname); ERROR:  parser: Subselect
hastoo many or too >> few fields. >>  >> The subselect only produces one column; so I think that the >> error message
iswrong. > >What is the GROUP BY doing?
 

This relates to the bug in pg_dump which messes up inherited constraints.

The object is to find which is the table in an inheritance hierarchy for
which the check constraint is first defined, which must inevitably be the
one with the lowest numbered oid.  The GROUP BY operates with the aggregate
to return the low-numbered oid for each separate rcname.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver              PGP key from public servers; key
ID32B8FAA1                ========================================    "The LORD is nigh unto all them that call upon
him,to     all that call upon him in truth."                                          Psalms 145:18
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug?
Next
From: Terry Mackintosh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tree type, how best to impliment?