Re: [HACKERS] dump/reload - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] dump/reload
Date
Msg-id 199806030405.AAA26237@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] dump/reload  (Brett McCormick <brett@work.chicken.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> On Tue, 2 June 1998, at 22:19:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > they don't always work, in the case of a table with an attribute that
> > > calls a function for its default value.
>
> > This is a good point, and something worth thinking about.  Maybe we
> > could scan through the defaults for a table, and call the dumpfunction
> > command for any functions.  Then when they are later attempted to be
> > created, they would fail, or we could somehow mark them as already
> > dumped.
>
> Would we look at the binary plan (aiee!) or just try and parse the
> string value 'pg_attdef.adsrc` for a function call?
>

Just thought about it.  With our new subselects we could:

    select * from pg_proc where proid in (select deffunc from pg_class)
        dump each func
    dump tables
    select * from pg_proc where proid not in (select deffunc from pg_class)
        dump each func

This sounds like a winner.  (I just made up the field names and stuff.)

Or are the oid's of the functions used in default values not immediately
available.  Is that the binary plan you were talking about.  That could
be very messy.  Now I see pg_attrdef.  This looks tough to grab function
names from.

Oh well.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dump/reload
Next
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections