Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON
Date
Msg-id 199805141455.KAA09202@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: [HACKERS] mmap and MAP_ANON  (Andreas Zeugswetter <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> >> - Could we use mmap:ing of files at a higher level then
> >>   src/backend/strorage/ipc/ipc.c to get even better performance
> >>   and cleaness?
> >
> >Yes, we could use mmap() to map the actual files.  I will post time
> >timings on this soon.
>
> I do not think this will be a practicable solution, since it would mean the whole db
> has to mmap'ed. This means there has to be enough virtual memory to hold
> the complete database, or at least one table at a time. Or do I understand this wrong ??

We can map parts of the table, even in 8k chunks.  However, looking at
my sequential scan timing tests, it would be slower.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: char(8) vs char8
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sequential scan speed, mmap, disk i/o