Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Date
Msg-id 199805120319.XAA11507@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
List pgsql-hackers
> I was thinking that we would have a pool of ready servers _per_database_.
> That is, we would be able to configure say 8 servers in a particular DB, and
> say 4 in another DB etc. These servers could run most of the way through
> initialization (open catalogs, read in syscache etc). Then they would wait
> until a connection for the desired DB was handed to them by the postmaster.
>

OK, but how do you invalidate the catalog items that have changed from
the startup to the time it gets the client connection?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contentionh]
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] money or dollar type