Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size
Date
Msg-id 199804240137.VAA09828@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size  (Byron Nikolaidis <byronn@insightdist.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The problem with that theory is this.  If the frontend application just
> executes some random query, such as "select * from table", you really do not
> know anything about what is coming back. You must rely on the little bit of
> information the protocol gives you.  In the case of Postgres, it gives you
> the fieldname, datatype, and size for each column in the result.
> Unfortunately, for varchar and char(n), the size reports -1.  This is not
> very helpful for describing the result set.
>
> Your above example works fine (in fact we use that already) when you know the
> table and column name, as in metadata functions such as SQLColumns() in the
> ODBC driver.

Yep.  We could pass back atttypmod as part of the PGresult.  I can add
that to the TODO list.  Would that help?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Anything like strftime() for PostgreSQL?
Next
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Anything like strftime() for PostgreSQL?