Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver and Dates - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver and Dates
Date
Msg-id 199804190116.VAA07618@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC driver and Dates  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>)
List pgsql-interfaces
> It has nothing to do with representation, but how data is transferred
> between client and server. The representation is done et a completely
> different level. It is due to PostgreSQL lacking a common universal
> binary transfer format that these problems have emerged in the first
> place - there is no sharp distinction between internal protocol and
> external representation.
>
> I think it was not meant to be that way at first, as there are special
> placed reserved in pg_type for both type conversion functions :
> typinput/typoutput (presumably machine dependent ones) and
> typreceive/typsend (presumably network-neutral ones),
> somehow they are always the same .
>
> I think that getting a common network-neutral binary format should also
> be in the TODO. Bruce?

This is an interesting idea.  It would be good to have more discussion
before I put something on the TODO list.  Not sure exactly where we are
going with this.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC 16 bit support
Next
From: Sbragion Denis
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Can't Update from MS Access (Was - Insight ODBC driver)