Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work?
Date
Msg-id 199804091351.JAA12933@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work?  (dg@illustra.com (David Gould))
List pgsql-hackers
>
> Bruce:
> > Maurice:
> > > >Running postgresql in interactive mode shows that for each query I
> > > >type there is memory lost. The exact amount of memory lost depends on
> > > >the query I use. The amount of memory not freed is also a function
> > > >of the number of tuples returned.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oops, it seems some palloced memory is not freed by pfree but
> > > using some other function(s).
> > > My mistake, sorry.
> > >
> >
> > One thing I have found is that:
> >
> >     select * from test where 1=0;
> >
> > do not leak memory while
> >
> >     select * from test where x=-999;
> >
> > does leak memory, even though neither returns any rows.  Strange.  Would
> > seem to point to the optimizer or executor.
>
> In the first case, the where clause is constant and evaluates false, so
> not much is done. In the second case, the table is scanned and presumably
> some memory is allocated for each row, probably to evaluate the expression.
> Since this memory is allocated into a per statement duration, it will not
> be freed until the end of the statement when the context is destroyed.

This will be fixed in the 6.3.2 patch, due out soon.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Data types
Next
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work?