Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration
Date
Msg-id 199803231706.MAA19835@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > But removing the other directories and requiring either a special
> > > installation or response to a prompt seems to go against the nature
> > > (and usefulness) of the configure system.
> >
> > It seems tcl/tk uses directory names with version numbers, and I have
> > no intention of searching for every version they have ever released.
>
>     Why not?  Or, rather, why not just do the ones that get reported
> to us?  It does hurt to, and I think it hurts more not too...

If someone wants to play with that, go ahead.  I see no reason the
installation person, if they want tcl/tk, should type in those directory
names.  However, if the actual library and include files have version
numbers in them, well, that is a pain.  Do they edit their source and
makefiles every time they upgrade versions?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas
Date:
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual