Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Subject Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
Date
Msg-id 199803190112.KAA20929@srapc451.sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
>imho, even though there is one user forcing arrays of single characters
>by invoking char2, rather than using text and substrings, that is not
>sufficient to keep this obsolete capability in the backend forever.

I agree with you. With the suggestion from Brett, the user now have
better solution than using char2, I think.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Next
From: "PostgreSQL On Peanuts.roanoke.edu"
Date:
Subject: regression testing on linux-elf 2.0.33, postgresql 6.3, i686