>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *** backend/libpq/pqcomm.c.orig Fri Feb 27 14:07:52 1998
>> --- backend/libpq/pqcomm.c Fri Feb 27 14:08:50 1998
>> ***************
>> *** 564,571 ****
>> * Shutdown routine for backend connection
>> * If a Unix socket is used for communication, explicitly close it.
>> */
>> ! static void
>> ! do_unlink()
>> {
>> if (sock_path[0])
>> unlink(sock_path);
>> --- 564,571 ----
>> * Shutdown routine for backend connection
>> * If a Unix socket is used for communication, explicitly close it.
>> */
>> ! void
>> ! StreamDoUnlink()
>
>
> What breaks by renaming this function?? :(
Nothing. do_unlink() is called only from line 648 and the line was
deleted by my patches.
Just removing "static" from the declaration of do_unlink might be ok.
However function name "do_unlink" would be too general IMHO.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii@sra.co.jp
