> spin-lock.patch
>
> I'm not sure if this is really useful, but it seems stupid to have
> a backend wasting cpu cycles in a busy loop while the process which
> should release the lock is waiting for the cpu. So I added a call
> to process_yield() if the spin lock can't obtained.
> This has been implemented and tested only on Linux. I don't know if
> other OS have process_yield(). If someone can check please do it.
Massimo brings up a good point. Most of our s_lock.h locking does asm
mutex loops looking for a lock. Unless we are using a multi-cpu
machine, there is no way this is going to change while we are spinning.
Linux has process_yield(), but most OS's don't. Is there a
platform-independent way to relinquish the cpu if the first attempt at
the spinlock fails? Would a select() of 1 microsecond work?
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
