Re: [HACKERS] Declaration glitch in arrayfuncs.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declaration glitch in arrayfuncs.c
Date
Msg-id 199802150112.UAA02951@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Declaration glitch in arrayfuncs.c  (Tom I Helbekkmo <tih@Hamartun.Priv.NO>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gee, I noticed the compile was broken, but did not realize is was me.
Thanks.


>
> Probably fixed already, since it's uncompilable, but anyway:
>
> The file 'backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c' won't compile with the
> February 14th snapshot, because of an inconsistency between the
> declaration and implementation of ReadArrayStr().  As far as I can
> tell, the predeclaration is wrong.  I assume this is what was meant:
>
> *** backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c.ORIG    Sat Feb 14 09:00:31 1998
> --- backend/utils/adt/arrayfuncs.c    Sat Feb 14 15:52:29 1998
> ***************
> *** 44,52 ****
>   /*-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*/
>   static int    _ArrayCount(char *str, int dim[], int typdelim);
>   static char *_ReadArrayStr(char *arrayStr, int nitems, int ndim, int dim[],
> !               FmgrInfo *inputproc, Oid typelem, char typdelim,
> !               int typlen, bool typbyval, char typalign,
> !               int *nbytes, int16 typmod);
>
>   #ifdef LOARRAY
>   static char *
> --- 44,52 ----
>   /*-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*/
>   static int    _ArrayCount(char *str, int dim[], int typdelim);
>   static char *_ReadArrayStr(char *arrayStr, int nitems, int ndim, int dim[],
> !               FmgrInfo *inputproc, Oid typelem, int16 typmod,
> !               char typdelim, int typlen, bool typbyval,
> !               char typalign, int *nbytes);
>
>   #ifdef LOARRAY
>   static char *
>
>
> -tih
> --
> Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
>
>
>


--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] Valid ports for v6.3 -- NetBSD/i386 compile errors
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] Valid ports for v6.3 -- NetBSD/i386 compile errors