Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...
Date
Msg-id 199802021713.MAA13364@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...  (darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> > > > Looks like this variable size stuff will be the first new feature
> > > > for 6.4 then, eh? :)
> > >
> > >         What is the chance of having this ready by Friday?  Still would
> > > give us 3weeks of debugging...
> >
> > Well, it's OK to leave _one_ feature for v6.4. Bruce is probably tired of typing
> > the feature list :)
> >
> > Also, we still have a few loose ends for v6.3. But, I'll bet Darren's stuff can
> > go in and not affect anything if we run using the current block size.
>
> Great chance of having it by Friday if not sooner.  I'll get on it tonite.
>
> Wasn't sure where the line in the sand was for "adding features" vs "fixing bugs."

I think Marc is getting softer on this issue.  [Ducks head]

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bug fix for select 'some Text'::char(16) (newest snapshot)
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests