Re: Investigating IO Saturation - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Investigating IO Saturation
Date
Msg-id 19963.1138122458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Investigating IO Saturation  (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>)
List pgsql-performance
Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info> writes:
> I'm investigating a potential IO issue.  We're running 7.4 on AIX 5.1.
> During periods of high activity (reads, writes, and vacuums), we are
> seeing iostat reporting 100% disk usage.  I have a feeling that the
> iostat numbers are misleading.  I can make iostat usage jump from less
> than 10% to greater than 95% by running a single vacuum against a
> moderate sized table (no noticeable change in the other activity).

That's not particularly surprising, and I see no reason to think that
iostat is lying to you.

More recent versions of PG include parameters that you can use to
"throttle" vacuum's I/O demand ... but unthrottled, it's definitely
an I/O hog.

The vmstat numbers suggest that vacuum is not completely killing you,
but you could probably get some improvement in foreground query
performance by throttling it back.  There are other good reasons to
consider an update, anyway.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: Investigating IO Saturation
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Investigating IO Saturation