Re: UPDATE query with variable number of OR conditions in WHERE - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: UPDATE query with variable number of OR conditions in WHERE
Date
Msg-id 19955.1363317317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPDATE query with variable number of OR conditions in WHERE  (Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk>)
List pgsql-sql
Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> writes:
> Quoth jorgemal1960@gmail.com (JORGE MALDONADO):
>> I am building an UPDATE query at run-time and one of the fields I want to
>> include in the WHERE condition may repeat several times, I do not know how
>> many.
>> 
>> UPDATE table1
>> SET field1 = "some value"
>> WHERE (field2 = value_1 OR field2 = value_2 OR .....OR field2 = value_n)
>> 
>> I build such a query using a programming language and, after that, I
>> execute it. Is this a good approach to build such a query?

> You can use IN for this:

>     UPDATE table1
>     SET field1 = "some value"
>     WHERE field2 IN (value_1, value_2, ...);

IN is definitely better style than a long chain of ORs.  Another
possibility is to use = ANY(ARRAY):
   UPDATE table1   SET field1 = "some value"   WHERE field2 = ANY (ARRAY[value_1, value_2, ...]);

This is not better than IN as-is (in particular, IN is SQL-standard and
this is not), but it opens the door to treating the array of values as a
single parameter:
   UPDATE table1   SET field1 = "some value"   WHERE field2 = ANY ($1::int[]);

(or text[], etc).  Now you can build the array client-side and not need
a new statement for each different number of comparison values.  If
you're not into prepared statements, this may not excite you, but some
people find it to be a big deal.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Ben Morrow
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE query with variable number of OR conditions in WHERE
Next
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: bug in 9.2.2 ? subquery accepts wrong column name : upd