Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions
Date
Msg-id 1990203.1601129470@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions
List pgsql-general
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> So, apparently pg_available_extension_versions already had those
> fields so all the required infrastructure was already there.  I just
> added the exact same fields to pg_available_extensions, see attached
> patch.

The reason that pg_available_extensions has only the fields it has
is that these other values are potentially extension-version-dependent.
I do not think we can accept this patch.

(Strictly speaking, the "comment" might be version-specific too, but
there's less chance of printing a critically misleading value there.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade Python version issue on openSUSE
Next
From: Paul Förster
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade Python version issue on openSUSE