I wrote:
> ... so basically it's all about the locking. Maybe the problem is that with
> HOT we lock the buffer too often? heap_page_prune_opt is designed to
> not take the buffer lock unless there's a good probability of needing
> to prune, but maybe that's not working as intended.
Indeed it seems it's not; gprof shows
0.00 0.00 111/1389276 index_getnext <cycle 7> [89] 0.05 49.52 1389165/1389276
heapgetpage [6]
[8] 50.9 0.05 49.52 1389276 heap_page_prune_opt [8] 7.17 42.31 1366696/1366696
heap_page_prune[9] 0.01 0.03 1366696/1366696 ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup [106]
0.01 0.00 2755558/2780795 PageGetHeapFreeSpace [177]
so this example is getting past the heuristic tests in
heap_page_prune_opt almost every time. Why is that? Too tired to poke
at it more tonight.
regards, tom lane
