Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From YUriy Zhuravlev
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 19843356.CygdiLMRRO@dinodell
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 25 November 2015 13:27:33 you wrote:
> That was years ago, mind, but I
> haven't seen CMake exactly taking over the world since then.
KDE, MariaDB, neovim and etc. New projects usually selected CMake. 

> Many prewritten CMake modules fail to follow basic practices that make them
> work anywhere but where the author wanted/needed.
Now everything is much better. And it is worth split "make" and configuration. 
CMake better GNU Make and is similar to the m4 for configuring. But M4 older 
and elaborated.

These are my feelings on the current work.

Thanks.
-- 
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups