Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)
Date
Msg-id 197162.1606171520@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a draft patch.

> Here's another of my own.  Outside of elog.c it seems identical.

Ah, I see I didn't cover the case in ProcSleep that you were originally on
about ... I'd just looked for existing references to log_min_messages
and client_min_messages.

I think it's important to have the explicit check for elevel >= ERROR.
I'm not too fussed about whether we invent is_log_level_output_client,
although that name doesn't seem well-chosen compared to
is_log_level_output.

Shall I press forward with this, or do you want to?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)