Re: nullif BUG??? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: nullif BUG???
Date
Msg-id 197.996376523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: nullif BUG???  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-sql
"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Er... what were you expecting, exactly?

AFAICT, the quoted behavior is correct per the defined behavior of
nullif(), cf 
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/functions-conditional.html
NULLIF(value1, value2)
The NULLIF function returns NULL if and only if value1 andvalue2 are equal. Otherwise it returns value1.

> Except for IS NULL (and COALESCE, which uses IS NULL) any operation
> involving a NULL is also NULL.

Well, that's not quite the correct reasoning.

NULLIF and COALESCE are both shorthands for CASE expressions, and hence
are capable of returning non-NULL for a NULL input.  It all depends on
how the CASE tests are phrased.  NULLIF is essentiallyCASE WHEN value1 = value2 THEN NULL ELSE value1 END
In the quoted example, "NULL = 5" will yield NULL, which is interpreted
as a FALSE case test, so you get the ELSE case, ie value1, ie NULL.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Who do I make _ not a wildcard?
Next
From: Mark kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: performance issue with distance function