Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
Date
Msg-id 19601.1163795674@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I also think the "thousands of lines" is an exaggeration :-)

I think a reasonable comparison point is the operator-class commands,
which are at least in the same general ballpark of complexity.
opclasscmds.c is currently 1075 lines, and that's not counting the
grammar additions, nor miscellaneous bits of support in places like
backend/nodes/, dependency.c if you expect to be able to DROP the
objects, namespace.c if they live in schemas, aclchk.c if they have
owners or permissions, comment.c, etc.  Teodor is proposing to add not
one but four new kinds of system objects.  In round numbers I would
bet that such a patch will add a lot closer to 10000 lines than 1000.

It may be worth doing anyway --- certainly CREATE OPERATOR CLASS was a
huge improvement over the previous ways of doing it --- but don't
underestimate the size of what we're talking about.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration