"Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> My best guess is simply that the indexer failed for some time and
> noone noticed for a few weeks. By the time it was re-run, some
> messages that it had missed were outside the timeframe that an
> incremental crawl would have picked up (the current, plus last month).
> Thoughts?
That would explain a contiguous range of messages that were not indexed,
but is that what we have? I think the thing to do before you destroy
the old index is make a list of which messages were indexed and which
weren't.
regards, tom lane
