Monday, October 25, 2010, 4:12:39 PM you wrote:
> "Jochen Erwied" <jochen@pgsql.erwied.eu> writes:
>> VACUUM FULL does not update statistics so display of pg_stat_user_tables=
is
>> wrong. A normal VACUUM updates the relevant information.
> Hmm. This is a definitional issue: what do we really mean by last_vacuum?
> I'm inclined to think that the current behavior is reasonable. VACUUM
> FULL is (still) not intended as a routine maintenance operation, and
> the point of that column is to track routine maintenance operations.
Well, when reading=20
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/monitoring-stats.html=20
then last_vacuum contains the last time of a user-initiated vacuum. There's=
=20
no distinction made what kind of vacuum was made. And IMHO even if VACUUM=
=20
FULL isn't meant for routine vacuuming, the state should be changed.
Of course the easiest way to fix this bug (or better flaw) is to change the
documentation :-)
--=20
Jochen Erwied | home: jochen@erwied.eu +49-208-38800-18, FAX: -19
Sauerbruchstr. 17 | work: joe@mbs-software.de +49-2151-7294-24, FAX: -50
D-45470 Muelheim | mobile: jochen.erwied@vodafone.de +49-173-5404164
