Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date
Msg-id 1953.1056389224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two Phase Commit WAS: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> No.  I want to know what the subordinate does when it's promised to
>> commit and the co-ordinator never responds.  AFAICS the subordinate
>> is screwed --- it can't commit, and it can't abort, and it can't expect
>> to make progress indefinitely on other work while it's holding locks
>> for the not-quite-committed transaction.

> Anyway, I would vote for a first implemenation for 2PC which addressed the 
> commit-then-crash issue in some expedient-but-not-reliable way, and putting 
> 2PC in /contrib with a "not for production use" warning.  Some people will 
> use it in production anyway, and hopefully one or more of them will put in 
> the dozens of hours required to make it reliable.

Putting in "dozens of hours" is not the issue here --- the problem is
that there isn't any solution in sight, and I'm not eager to go down a
path that has an obvious dead end.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink_ora - a first shot on Oracle ...