Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance
Date
Msg-id 194ab08d4e0392152ed7dfd3fa4a6ea7de6250a6.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance  (James Pang <jamespang886@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance  (James Pang <jamespang886@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, 2024-02-23 at 15:20 +0800, James Pang wrote:
>    we have a SQL from Postgresql JDBC,  primary is based on (bigint,varchar2,bigint),
> but from sql plan, it convert to ::numeric so the plan just use one "varchar"
> key column and use the other 2 bigint keys as filters. what's the cause about that ? 
>
>                             Table "test.xxxxxx"
>       Column      |              Type              | Collation | Nullable | Default
> ------------------+--------------------------------+-----------+----------+---------
>   xxxid           | bigint                         |           | not null |
>  paramname        | character varying(512)         |           | not null |
>  paramvalue       | character varying(1536)        |           |          |
>   sssid           | bigint                         |           | not null |
>  createtime       | timestamp(0) without time zone |           |          |
>  lastmodifiedtime | timestamp(0) without time zone |           |          |
>  mmmuuid          | character varying(32)          |           |          |
> Indexes:
>       "pk_xxxxxx" PRIMARY KEY, btree (xxxid, paramname, sssid)
>       "idx_xxxxxx_mmmuuid" btree (sssid, mmmuuid, paramname)
>
> SET extra_float_digits = 3
>
> duration: 7086.014 ms  plan:
>         Query Text: SELECT XXXFID, PARAMNAME, PARAMVALUE, SSSID, CREATETIME, LASTMODIFIEDTIME, MMMUUID FROM
test.XXXXXXWHERE  ( ( XXXID = $1  ) )  AND  ( ( PARAMNAME = $2  ) )  AND  ( ( SSSID = $3  ) ) 
>         Index Scan using pk_xxxxxx on test.xxxxxx  (cost=0.57..2065259.09 rows=1 width=86) (actual
time=7086.010..7086.011rows=0 loops=1) 
>           Output: confid, paramname, paramvalue, sssid, createtime, lastmodifiedtime, mmmuuid
>           Index Cond: ((xxxxxx.paramname)::text = 'cdkkifffff'::text)   <<< just use only one key instead all primary
keys.
>           Filter: (((xxxxxx.xxxid)::numeric = '18174044'::numeric) AND ((xxxxxx.sssid)::numeric =
'253352'::numeric))   <<< it's bigint but converted to numeric  
>           Buffers: shared read=1063470
>           I/O Timings: read=4402.029
>
> it's from JDBC, we saw this JDBC driver try to set extra_float_digits = 3 before
> running the SQL ,does that make planner to convert bigint to numeric ?

Setting "extra_float_digits" is just something the JDBC driver does so as to
not lose precision with "real" and "double precision" values on old versions
of PostgreSQL.

The problem is that you bind the query parameters with the wrong data types.
Don't use "setBigDecimal()", but "setLong()" if you want to bind a "bigint".
An alternative is "setObject()" with "targetSqlType" set to "Types.BIGINT".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: James Pang
Date:
Subject: Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance
Next
From: James Pang
Date:
Subject: Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance