Re: incompatible pointer type - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: incompatible pointer type
Date
Msg-id 19486.1319056865@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: incompatible pointer type  (Robert Young <yayooo@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Robert Young <yayooo@gmail.com> writes:
> As I tested, if you explicit appoint a union tag, the OpenBSD m4 and
> GNU m4 work identically.
> And This explicit definition just corresponding to the forward-declaration.

> As mentioned in
> http://www.gnu.org/s/bison/manual/html_node/Union-Decl.html
> This feature is a POSIX  extension.
> I don't know what impact to other platform.

> So I suppose this should be the appropriate patch to solve this problem

I don't think we're going to worry too much about making plpgsql cope
with an m4 that's too old to support autoconf, which I gather is the
case from the bison bug report thread I mentioned before.  If you're
going to be changing the source code or working from a git pull, you
need to have reasonably non-broken tools.  We do provide pre-made bison
output in release tarballs, if you don't want to take the responsibility
of having a non-buggy bison available.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?