"George Pavlov" <gpavlov@mynewplace.com> writes:
> We have a nightly restart of one PG database.
Just out of curiosity, what for? I can't imagine any really good reason
for just shutting down the postmaster and immediately restarting it.
> So it looks like the STOPPING of the service actually succeeded, albeit
> it took a while (more than the usual sessions open?). The STARTING is
> the one that actually failed (is that because the STOP was still in
> process?). The question is why -- in a RESTART situation
> wouldn't/shouldn't the START part wait for the STOP part to complete
> (regardless of how long it takes)?
Well, this'd depend on the details of the postgres init script you're
using, which you gave no hint about (and yes, there are a *ton* of
different versions out there). The one I'm currently shipping for Red
Hat would give up waiting after a minute, but it should report failure
not success in that case.
regards, tom lane
