Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> In the discussion with Andres the same point came up for palloc, for
> which I suggested we add something along the lines of:
> #define palloc_object(_type_) (_type_ *) palloc(sizeof(_type_))
> #define palloc_array(_type_, n) (_type_ *) palloc((n) * sizeof(_type_))
I'm far less excited about that, mainly because you'd have to also cover
palloc0, repalloc, MemoryContextAlloc, etc etc. Also I've not seen
very many actual bugs that this would've helped with.
regards, tom lane
