Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date
Msg-id 18945.1181772355@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Once you have an XML plan what can you do with it? All you can do is parse it
> into constituent bits and display it. You cant do any sort of comparison
> between plans, aggregate results, search for plans matching constraints, etc.

Sure you can, just not in SQL ;-)

Given the amount of trouble we'd have to go to to put the data into a
pure SQL format, I don't think that's exactly an ideal answer either.
I'm for making the raw EXPLAIN output be in a simple and robust format,
which people can then postprocess however they want --- including
forcing it into SQL if that's what they want.  But just because we're a
SQL database doesn't mean we should think SQL is the best answer to
every problem.

While I'm surely not an XML fanboy, it looks better suited to this
problem than a pure relational representation would be.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues
Next
From: PFC
Date:
Subject: Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints