Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shayon Mukherjee
Subject Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX
Date
Msg-id 1881935D-B976-4BAE-B11B-0C9190FEF0D6@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX  (Shayon Mukherjee <shayonj@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you for the historical context and working, I understand what you were referring to before now.

Shayon

> On Sep 24, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 23.09.24 22:51, Shayon Mukherjee wrote:
>> I am happy to draft a patch for this as well. I think I have a working
>> idea so far of where the necessary checks might go. However if you don’t
>>  mind, can you elaborate further on how the effect would be similar to
>> enable_indexscan?
>
> Planner settings like enable_indexscan used to just add a large number (disable_cost) to the estimated plan node
costs. It's a bit more sophisticated in PG17.  But in any case, I imagine "disabling an index" could use the same
mechanism. Or maybe not, maybe the setting would just completely ignore the index. 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: AIO writes vs hint bits vs checksums