Re: postgres 11 issue? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgres 11 issue?
Date
Msg-id 18737.1562192312@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres 11 issue?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
I wrote:
> It looks like what's happening is that the result of my_from_local()
> is being stored into the table as an anonymous record value rather
> than a value of type my_timestamp.  (The originating session can figure
> out what the anonymous record type is, but no other session can.)

I pushed a fix for this:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=24c5c711f497c995ad7b560aedd41b4d0f0f77f4

Thanks for the report!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allocating shared memory in Postgres
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Too short field